|
|
|
Basic InformationMore InformationLatest NewsHIV No Barrier to Getting Liver Transplant, Study FindsXofigo Approved for Prostate CancerTest Approved to Detect Faulty Lung Cancer GeneNew Drug May Help Immune System Fight CancerCancer Patients May Face Higher Bankruptcy OddsFDA Approves New Drug to Fight Advanced Prostate CancerMetformin Won't Aid Breast Cancer Survival in DiabeticsCreative Arts Therapies Up Mental Health for Cancer PatientsExperts Aim to Draw Attention to High Cancer Drug CostsCreative Arts May Help Cancer Patients CopeAgent Orange Tied to Lethal Prostate CancerScientists Discover More Genetic Clues to Testicular CancerSocializing May Ease Pain of Breast CancerGene Discovery May Offer Breakthrough for Rare LeukemiaRed Hair Pigment Might Raise Melanoma Risk: StudySkin Cancer Tx Mostly Surgical, Regardless of Life ExpectancyAATS: MnDCT Beats Chest X-Ray for Detecting Lung CancerProstate Cancer May Be Deadlier for the UninsuredSleep Woes Tied to Prostate Cancer Risk in StudyAUA: Incidence of Testicular Cancer Up Through 2009Study Links Timing of ER Visit to Prostate Cancer Survival OddsTesticular Cancer on Rise in U.S., Especially Among Hispanic MenUrologists' Group Issues Updated Guidelines on PSA TestAt-Home Drug Errors Common for Kids With Cancer, Research ShowsScientists Pinpoint Most Major Genes Behind Deadly Blood CancerImplants May Delay Breast Cancer Detection, Raise Death RiskComprehensive Analysis Supports SERMs for Cutting Breast CancerNovel System Proposed for Accountable Cancer CareWomen Smokers More Likely to Get Colon Cancer Than Men: StudyFor Some Seniors With Skin Cancer, Surgery Not Always Best ChoiceComprehensive Discussion With Docs Ups Cancer ScreeningHistory of Skin Cancer Linked to Secondary CancersIntegrated 2D, 3D Mammogram Improves Cancer DetectionSoaring Prices Keep Leukemia Drugs From Patients, Experts SayRace, Income Tied to Breast Cancer Treatment Delays, Reduced SurvivalObesity Tied to Risk of Prostate Cancer After Negative BiopsyNon-Melanoma Skin Cancers Tied to Risk for Other CancersObesity Linked to Prostate Cancer, Study FindsMammograms Can Measure How Breast Cancer Drug Is Working: StudyScientists Spot Cancer Metabolism ChangesMinorities Less Prone to Think They'll Get Cancer: StudyClinical Trials Helped One Woman's Fight Against CancerARRS: MASS Criteria, LDH Predict Survival in MelanomaScientists Create Breast Cancer Survival PredictorEndocrine Therapy Often Incomplete after Breast CancerEndometriosis Surgery Linked to Lower Ovarian Cancer RiskReview Suggests Breast Cancer Screens Should Be PersonalizedMenopause-Like Woes Hinder Breast Cancer Treatment: StudySmoking Raises Asbestos Workers' Cancer Risk, Study SaysGene May Boost Death Risk From Most Common Thyroid Cancer LinksBook Reviews |
| |
by Jerome Groopman Viking Press, 2000 Review by Christian Perring on May 31st 2000 
Second Opinions is about difficult decisions and when to trust a doctor's judgment. Each of the eight well-told stories is a meditation on how to negotiate the uncertainties of medicine. Groopman is excellent at explaining difficult issues in simple ways, and each case is fascinating. The points he makes are also well considered and useful. As with his previous book, The Measure of Our Days [reviewed in Metapsychology, September 1998] his writing is compassionate and thoughtful. This new book might help give people the courage to question the pronouncements of experts and trust their intuition. Most of the cases are non-psychiatric, but one is about his grandpa Max, who was showing signs of dementia. Max's doctor did a perfectly good job diagnosing Alzheimer's, but what Groopman remembers most about that difficult time was he doctor's cold indifference to the needs of the family. When Max was to be taken from the hospital to a nursing home, the doctor failed to notify the family when transfer would take place. Max was taken to a strange place on his own, and of course he was frightened and disturbed. His daughter blamed herself for not helping her father more. Groopman blames the doctor for not taking the trouble to be more sensitive to the emotions of his patient. Other cases deal with Groopman's own patients and his interactions with his peers. He notes how defensive some doctors become when their opinions are questioned, and let their pride come before the health of their patients. One of the recurrent themes in these stories how good physicians should welcome the opportunity to learn from colleagues and work with others to maximize their patient's chances of recovery from serious illness. In another case he has to fight with an HMO in order to get funding for a more experimental treatment for his patient's cancer. The irony is that the HMO was ready to pay for standard treatment, which was just as expensive as the experimental treatment. As with so many stories we hear about HMOs, what is so disgusting is not just the translation of human life into monetary value, but the massive stupidity of the decisions made. I hope to see future books by other authors detailing the mismanagement of health care by HMOs. Groopman's strength as an author is his ability to capture the little details and deliver a clear moral through his stories. Nevertheless, he spends little time discussing more general issues, and he can hardly avoid the fact that his stories are unusual. Most people don't have leading researchers on cancer or AIDS as their physicians or in their families. Most of us feel at the mercy of a system that costs too much and leaves us feeling lucky if the physician remembers our name. So while Second Opinions is a powerful book, its implications seem a little removed from the experience of ordinary people trying to work out what to do when faced with difficult decisions. But Groopman does at least provide an ideal at which we can aim. |